What an absolutely terrific post! I completely agree with Connie Jasperson about Strunk &White: too rigid, outdated (even though the general sentiment is fine). I have often recommended both Story and The Writer’s Journey to fellow writers–and I’ve promoted Rhetorical Grammar aggressively on this blog several times. This “textbook” provides a whole new way of looking at how readers read what you wrote. Invaluable! Thanks, Connie!
I use the internet for researching many things on a daily basis. However, in my office, some reference books must be in their hardcopy forms, such as The Chicago Manual of Style. I (and most other editors) rely on the CMOS, as it’s the most comprehensive style guide, and is geared for writers of essays and novels, fiction, and nonfiction.
Strunk and White’s Elements of Style is an acceptable beginner style guide, but is presented in an arbitrary, arrogant fashion and sometimes runs contrary to commonly accepted practice. Strunk and White’s Elements of Style is still the same book it was when it was originally conceived, as it has not changed or evolved, despite the way our modern language has changed and evolved. Because the Elements of Style is somewhat antiquated in the rules it forces upon the writer, I no longer even own a copy of it.
Instead, I…
View original post 727 more words
Just Can't Help Writing 
Thank you for the reblog – and for the comments about Strunk and White. I so agree!
LikeLiked by 1 person
My pleasure. BTW, I do find thesaurus.com awfully handy. My ancient hard-cover thesaurus, used since I was a teenager, disintegrated and the paperback substitutes I’ve picked up just aren’t the same. You’ve made me consider trying a new hard-cover option. Thanks again!
LikeLiked by 1 person